57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
14
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
13.4
12.0
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
153
111
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen