57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
21
4
10
14
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
3.3
6.0
13.4
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
109
153
Nass
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Nassfahrverhalten
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Trockenleistung
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kosten
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen