59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone TZ300a gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
TZ300a
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
18
14
7
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.1
13.4
2.3
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
13
153
47
153
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Firestone TZ300a Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 BFGoodrich Advantage Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.