57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
6
4
5
24
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.8
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
146
40
139
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen