59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Blue Response TG gegen Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Blue Response TG
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
1
8
6
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
3.8
1.0
2.8
2.5
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
40
36
11
137
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
99%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
98%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
100%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
33%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Dunlop Blue Response TG
33%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Dunlop Blue Response TG Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.