57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
24
5
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
12.0
2.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
40
111
151
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen