Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Hankook ION Evo

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

2. Hankook ION Evo Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 224

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

3. Hankook ION Evo 64

4. Falken e.Ziex 34

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 15x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. Hankook ION Evo 1x

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 20.

1. Hankook ION Evo 1

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Hankook ION Evo 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 2025

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Sehr empfohlen

4. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Bedingt empfohlen

4. Hankook ION Evo ?

Hankook
ION Evo

89%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

79%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. Hankook ION Evo 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 87%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 90%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

3. Hankook ION Evo 77%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 97%

2. Falken e.Ziex 87%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 79%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Hankook
ION Evo

92%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

70%

1. Hankook ION Evo 92%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 81%

4. Falken e.Ziex 81%

1. Hankook ION Evo 91%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 76%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 67%

3. Hankook ION Evo 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Hankook
ION Evo

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

67%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Hankook ION Evo 66%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 66%

3. Falken e.Ziex 0%

4. Hankook ION Evo 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 91%

2. Hankook ION Evo 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 72%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. Hankook ION Evo ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ?

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Kumho
Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook
ION Evo

70%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

65%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 73%

4. Hankook ION Evo 69%

1. Hankook ION Evo 82%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 64%

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 63%

2. Hankook ION Evo 60%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 23%

1. Hankook ION Evo A

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

3. Kumho Ecsta PS71 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?