57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
1
4
6
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#7
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
7.0
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2023
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
87
40
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen