57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
4
5
6
3
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
3.3
4.8
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
40
158
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen