57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
14
5
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#8
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
6.0
13.4
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
42
109
153
139

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich