57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
16
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
11.9
5.5
3.3
4.8
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2023
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
165
153
40
158
36

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich