57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

6.0
R13
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
6
4
3
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#3
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
5.5
12.0
4.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
—
153
111
146
40
36

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMMichelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich