Segment 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Premium 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium 4. Hankook ION Evo Premium
Anzahl der verfügbaren Größen 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123 2. Hankook ION Evo 64 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 0
Anzahl der Tests 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 1x 4. Hankook ION Evo 1x
Beste Position im Test 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1. 2. Hankook ION Evo 1. 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2. 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5.
Schlechteste Position im Test 1. Hankook ION Evo 1. 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5. 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5. 4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.
Durchschnittliche Position in Tests 1. Hankook ION Evo 1 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 5
Jahr der letzten Prüfung 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025 2. Hankook ION Evo 2025 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 2024
Beste Bewertung im Test 1. Hankook ION Evo Beispielhaft 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut
Schlechteste Bewertung im Test 1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV Gut 4. Hankook ION Evo ?
Nass(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 88% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 79% Michelin Primacy 4+ 75%
Nassbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 97% 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Aquaplaning - quer 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. Hankook ION Evo 87% 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%
Handling - nass 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Aquaplaning - längs 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 90% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79% 3. Hankook ION Evo 77% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%
Nassbremsung nach EU-Label 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ A 2. Hankook ION Evo A 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?
Trocken(Gesamtbewertung) Hankook ION Evo 92% Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 77%
Trockenbremsen 1. Hankook ION Evo 91% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77% 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 70%
Handling - trocken 1. Hankook ION Evo 92% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83% 3. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%
Komfort(Gesamtbewertung) Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 98% Michelin Primacy 4+ 80% Hankook ION Evo 72% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 63%
Komfort 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 95% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83% 3. Hankook ION Evo 78% 4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%
Außengeräusch 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 100% 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67% 4. Hankook ION Evo 66%
Außenlärm nach EU-Label 1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ? 2. Michelin Primacy 4+ ? 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ? 4. Hankook ION Evo ?
Kosten(Gesamtbewertung) Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72% Hankook ION Evo 69%
Rollwiderstand 1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82% 2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV 80% 3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72% 4. Hankook ION Evo 69%
Kraftstoffverbrauch nach eu-label 1. Hankook ION Evo A 2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B 3. Michelin Primacy 4+ C 4. Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV ?