Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 188

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 14x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 7.

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 3.57

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Gut

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

76%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 75%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 81%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 64%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 55%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 B

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

71%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 56%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 64%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 59%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 74%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 66%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 79%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 92%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6

56%

1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 28%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 C