59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
4
18
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
12.0
6.1
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
111
47
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Seitenführung
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Firestone Roadhawk Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.