57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
13
36
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
4.3
3.1
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2023
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
123
303

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen