57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
5
23
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.8
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
139
176
36
302

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich