57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
16
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
5.5
3.7
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2023
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
153
36
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen