Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Gut

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 74%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 0%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

86%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 78%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 59%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

74%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 91%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?