57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
24
14
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
2.7
3.6
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
111
302
194
36

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich