57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Imperial EcoSport SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Imperial
EcoSport SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
2
4
3
4
3
Optimale Position
#10
#3
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
12.0
3.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2022
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
71
111
36
40
36

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Imperial EcoSport SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Imperial EcoSport SUV
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Imperial EcoSport SUV
47%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Imperial EcoSport SUV
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Imperial EcoSport SUV
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Imperial EcoSport SUV
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Imperial EcoSport SUV
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Imperial EcoSport SUV
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich