57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
10
49
4
23
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.2
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
213
40
176

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen