Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Premium

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 265

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 24x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. Falken e.Ziex 3x

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 1.

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 9.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2.67

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 2025

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

1. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Testsieger

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Empfohlen

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Falken e.Ziex Gut

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. Falken e.Ziex 68%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 74%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 86%

3. Falken e.Ziex 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 91%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Falken e.Ziex 69%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 B

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 80%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 90%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 76%

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 73%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 84%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

86%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

82%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

66%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 99%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 56%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 72%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%