57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Fulda EcoControl HP2Budget
FuldaFulda

EcoControl HP2

7.2
R15 – R18
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
8
4
4
Optimale Position
#2
#4
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
12.8
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
30
111
40

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFulda EcoControl HP2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs Debica Presto HP2Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich