57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
14
3
4
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
3.6
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
153
194
36
40

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich