57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 UltraContact NXT WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
10
24
4
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
2.7
3.3
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
302
40
194

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian WetproofGoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PGoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen