57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
10
4
6
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
12.0
4.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
111
146
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen