57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Solus HA31 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Solus HA31
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
13
18
6
4
Optimale Position
#8
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.3
4.3
6.1
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
82
123
47
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Solus HA31
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Kumho Solus HA31
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Solus HA31
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Solus HA31
67%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Solus HA31
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Solus HA31
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Solus HA31
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Solus HA31
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Solus HA31
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Solus HA31
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Solus HA31
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen