57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
6
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.5
6.1
4.7
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
54
47
146
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen