Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

3. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 0

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 2x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

3. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 3.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 7.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 5

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

3. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) 2019

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin CrossClimate+ (!) Zufriedenstellend

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend