58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
8
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.8
5.0
3.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
36
146
40
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.