58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
8
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.0
3.8
3.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
146
36
40
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.