58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
8
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.0
3.3
3.8
1.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
146
40
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.