57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 P gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
29
24
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
180
302

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen