58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.3
12.0
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
532
111
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Michelin e.Primacy Continental UltraContact NXT GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.