57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian Line SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nokian
Line SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
21
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.2
11.9
13.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
33
165
153
40

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Nokian Line SUV
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Nokian Line SUV
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich