Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Premium

2. Nokian Line Obere-Mittelklasse

3. Firestone Roadhawk Obere-Mittelklasse

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

3. Nokian Line 53

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 47

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18x

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

4. Nokian Line 6x

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 1.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

3. Nokian Line 6.

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

1. Nokian Line 17.

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 18.

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

4. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 6.11

2. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

3. Nokian Line 12.17

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 2024

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. Nokian Line 2018

1. Firestone Roadhawk Beispielhaft

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Beispielhaft

3. BFGoodrich Advantage Gut

4. Nokian Line Gut

1. Nokian Line Gut

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Zufriedenstellend

3. Firestone Roadhawk Bedingt empfohlen

4. BFGoodrich Advantage Ausreichend

Nokian
Line

82%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

61%

1. Nokian Line 84%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 69%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 61%

1. Nokian Line 80%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 57%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

3. Nokian Line 72%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 53%

1. Nokian Line 84%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 72%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 89%

2. Nokian Line 87%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 69%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 A

2. Nokian Line A

3. Firestone Roadhawk A

4. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Firestone
Roadhawk

84%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

80%

Nokian
Line

75%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

2. Nokian Line 83%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 80%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 87%

2. Nokian Line 85%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 77%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 0%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

2. Nokian Line 80%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 76%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 73%

1. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

2. Nokian Line 74%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 70%

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 0%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

95%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Nokian
Line

62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 63%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

4. Nokian Line 63%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 84%

2. Nokian Line 78%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. BFGoodrich Advantage 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 97%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 65%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

4. Nokian Line 30%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 100%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 93%

3. Nokian Line 78%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 B

2. BFGoodrich Advantage C

3. Nokian Line C

4. Firestone Roadhawk C

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

74%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Nokian
Line

66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 75%

2. Nokian Line 72%

3. BFGoodrich Advantage 68%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 71%

4. Nokian Line 66%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 90%

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 72%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

4. Nokian Line 60%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 ?

2. Firestone Roadhawk ?

3. Nokian Line ?

4. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB