57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.DE

Vergleich: Nokian Line gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Nokian LineObere-Mittelklasse
NokianNokian

Line

R14 – R17
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
10
3
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.3
6.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
53
40
109
36

Nass

Nass
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Nokian Line vs Nokian WetproofNokian Line vs Firestone RoadhawkNokian Line vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNNokian Line vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich