58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nokian
WR C3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
8
4
4
Optimale Position
#7
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
7.0
6.1
5.0
3.3
3.8
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
23
47
146
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian WR C3
31%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Handling - nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Nassbremsen
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Nokian WR C3
25%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Nokian WR C3
33%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian WR C3
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Nokian WR C3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Trockenbremsen
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Nokian WR C3
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian WR C3
96%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian WR C3
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Nokian WR C3
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
Nokian WR C3
43%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.