Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 123

2. Falken e.Ziex 34

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 13x

2. Falken e.Ziex 3x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 1.

2. Falken e.Ziex 2.

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Falken e.Ziex 5.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WR C3 7.

4. Michelin Primacy 4+ 8.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 4.31

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 2025

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Sehr empfohlen

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ Gut

3. Falken e.Ziex Gut

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

Michelin
Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken
e.Ziex

73%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 72%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Falken e.Ziex 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 78%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 68%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 79%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ A

3. Nokian WR C3 E

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Nokian
WR C3

97%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Michelin
Primacy 4+

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

Falken
e.Ziex

83%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 75%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 74%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 90%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 88%

3. Nokian WR C3 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 73%

1. Falken e.Ziex 88%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 87%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 83%

2. Falken e.Ziex 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

81%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Falken e.Ziex 78%

3. Michelin Primacy 4+ 77%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ 85%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

3. Nokian WR C3 50%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin Primacy 4+ ?

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Nokian WR C3 ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Falken
e.Ziex

95%

Michelin
Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Falken e.Ziex 95%

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ 82%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

2. Michelin Primacy 4+ C

3. Nokian WR C3 C

4. Falken e.Ziex ?