Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Nokian WR C3 Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 104

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 9x

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

2. Nokian WR C3 7.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 13.

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 2024

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Gut

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 80%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 79%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 A

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

4. Nokian WR C3 E

Nokian
WR C3

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

87%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 89%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 85%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

74%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 73%

4. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 71%

4. Nokian WR C3 50%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ?

4. Nokian WR C3 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho
Ecsta HS52

70%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 70%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 C

4. Nokian WR C3 C