Vergleich: Nokian WR C3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 5

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Premium

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Premium

3. Michelin Primacy 5 Premium

4. Nokian WR C3 Obere-Mittelklasse

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 153

2. Michelin Primacy 5 126

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 23

4. Nokian WR C3 23

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 16x

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2x

3. Michelin Primacy 5 1x

4. Nokian WR C3 1x

1. Michelin Primacy 5 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2.

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 3.

4. Nokian WR C3 7.

1. Michelin Primacy 5 1.

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 5.

3. Nokian WR C3 7.

4. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 12.

1. Michelin Primacy 5 1

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 3.5

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 5.5

4. Nokian WR C3 7

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 2025

2. Michelin Primacy 5 2025

3. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2023

4. Nokian WR C3 2018

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Beispielhaft

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Sehr gut

3. Michelin Primacy 5 Testsieger

4. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Empfohlen

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Gut

3. Nokian WR C3 Bedingt empfohlen

4. Michelin Primacy 5 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

84%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Michelin
Primacy 5

58%

Nokian
WR C3

30%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 66%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 51%

4. Nokian WR C3 33%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 87%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 74%

3. Nokian WR C3 33%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 78%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 76%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 65%

4. Nokian WR C3 25%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 89%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 69%

3. Nokian WR C3 25%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 81%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 61%

3. Nokian WR C3 33%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance A

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 A

3. Michelin Primacy 5 A

4. Nokian WR C3 E

Nokian
WR C3

97%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

?

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

?

Michelin
Primacy 5

?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

80%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin
Primacy 5

73%

Nokian
WR C3

61%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 83%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 76%

4. Nokian WR C3 62%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 93%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 77%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 69%

4. Nokian WR C3 53%

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

74%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Nokian
WR C3

66%

Michelin
Primacy 5

1%

1. Nokian WR C3 81%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 75%

3. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 67%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 0%

1. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 73%

2. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 73%

3. Nokian WR C3 50%

4. Michelin Primacy 5 1%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 69 dB

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 ?

3. Nokian WR C3 ?

4. Michelin Primacy 5 ?

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance

86%

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin
Primacy 5

63%

Nokian
WR C3

43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 86%

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 72%

3. Michelin Primacy 5 63%

4. Nokian WR C3 43%

1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance B

2. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 B

3. Michelin Primacy 5 B

4. Nokian WR C3 C