57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
5
14
18
4
5
Optimale Position
#9
#8
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.4
6.1
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
153
47
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen