57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
6
13
5
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
4.7
4.3
2.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
146
123
63
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen