57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
5
1
6
3
4
Optimale Position
#9
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
2.2
1.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
63
27
146
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen