57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
14
18
5
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.3
6.1
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
40
532
47
158
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen