57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
10
28
4
Optimale Position
#9
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.0
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
109
67
40

Nass

Nass
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Schnee

Schnee
Viking FourTech Plus
68%

Kosten

Kosten
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Viking FourTech Plus
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich