58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking FourTech Plus gegen Nokian Powerproof 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
FourTech Plus
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
3
4
18
8
4
Optimale Position
#9
#6
#3
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.0
12.0
6.1
5.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
24
91
111
47
146
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
77%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking FourTech Plus
75%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking FourTech Plus
85%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking FourTech Plus
92%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
74%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
68%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Viking FourTech Plus
65%
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Viking FourTech Plus
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking FourTech Plus
72%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking FourTech Plus
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking FourTech Plus
64%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking FourTech Plus
53%
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking FourTech Plus
79%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.