57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
14
3
4
Optimale Position
#11
#1
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.0
6.1
13.4
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
47
153
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.de

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen