Vergleich: Viking Fourtech gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Premium

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium

3. Falken e.Ziex Obere-Mittelklasse

4. Viking Fourtech Budget-Reifen

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 151

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 58

3. Falken e.Ziex 34

4. Viking Fourtech 32

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 24x

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 5x

3. Viking Fourtech 5x

4. Falken e.Ziex 3x

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 1.

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 1.

3. Falken e.Ziex 2.

4. Viking Fourtech 11.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 4.

2. Falken e.Ziex 5.

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 9.

4. Viking Fourtech 25.

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2.2

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2.71

3. Falken e.Ziex 3.67

4. Viking Fourtech 17

1. Falken e.Ziex 2025

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 2025

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2025

4. Viking Fourtech 2021

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV Beispielhaft

2. Falken e.Ziex Sehr gut

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Testsieger

4. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Gut

2. Falken e.Ziex Gut

3. Viking Fourtech Zufriedenstellend

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

76%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Viking
Fourtech

72%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 78%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 79%

3. Viking Fourtech 77%

4. Falken e.Ziex 68%

1. Falken e.Ziex 87%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 85%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 75%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 79%

2. Falken e.Ziex 77%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 77%

4. Viking Fourtech 55%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 86%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 74%

3. Falken e.Ziex 69%

4. Viking Fourtech 59%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 75%

4. Falken e.Ziex 61%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV A

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 B

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

92%

Viking
Fourtech

68%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

?

Falken
e.Ziex

?

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Viking Fourtech 51%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 90%

2. Viking Fourtech 82%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 93%

2. Viking Fourtech 67%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Viking Fourtech 71%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 0%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Viking
Fourtech

79%

Falken
e.Ziex

72%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

68%

1. Viking Fourtech 96%

2. Falken e.Ziex 95%

3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 87%

4. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 77%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 96%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 74%

3. Viking Fourtech 65%

4. Falken e.Ziex 60%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 87%

2. Viking Fourtech 77%

3. Falken e.Ziex 60%

4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 43%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV B

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 C

3. Viking Fourtech ?

4. Falken e.Ziex ?

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

84%

Falken
e.Ziex

78%

Viking
Fourtech

71%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 83%

3. Viking Fourtech 66%

4. Falken e.Ziex 0%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 90%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 84%

3. Falken e.Ziex 78%

4. Viking Fourtech 76%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV ?

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ?

3. Falken e.Ziex ?

4. Viking Fourtech ?

Michelin
CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken
e.Ziex

84%

Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Viking
Fourtech

59%

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 92%

2. Falken e.Ziex 88%

3. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 82%

4. Viking Fourtech 47%

1. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV 84%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 82%

3. Falken e.Ziex 81%

4. Viking Fourtech 71%